|

Recognizing Emergent Dermatologic Conditions
Dermatologists discuss the clinical presentation
and management of Rocky Mountain spotted fever, meningococcemia,
necrotizing fasciitis, cutaneous anthrax, Stevens-Johnson syndrome,
and toxic epidermal necrolysis.
By Deidre A. Buddin, MD, and Frederick C. Beddingfield
III, MD, PhD
| Dr. Buddin is a resident and Dr. Beddingfield
is an assistant clinical professor in the department of medicine,
division of dermatology, at the David Geffen School of Medicine
at UCLA. |
The skin is not only the body's largest organ but also the most
visible. Cutaneous signs and symptoms are often early manifestations
of systemic disease. By being familiar with the different types
of eruptions associated with serious disease, the clinician can
initiate the appropriate workup and diagnostic tests as well as
early medical intervention, which can have a significant effect
on outcome. This article will highlight several dermatologic emergencies
related to systemic disease that require prompt diagnosis and treatment.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER
Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) has the highest mortality rate
of any tick-borne illness in the United States. The clinician faces
a dilemma when evaluating a patient presenting with potential signs
and symptoms of RMSF. Consideration of the disease in the differential
diagnosis and prompt treatment prior to confirmation of the diagnosis
are critical with this readily treatable but potentially deadly
illness.
Rocky Mountain spotted fever is caused by the organism Rickettsia
rickettsii, an obligate intracellular gram-negative bacterium
that is transmitted through the bite of a tick. The organism is
spread by a variety of ticks located throughout the United States.
About 90% of cases are seen between the months of April and September.
Patients most often present with symptoms 3 to 12 days after the
tick bite, but many will not give a history of a bite. Initial symptoms
may include fever, nausea, vomiting, severe headache, and muscle
pain, essentially mimicking more common, viral illnesses, which
may delay the diagnosis. Around the fourth day of fever, an eruption
occurs on the ankles, wrists, and forehead. This eruption is initially
blanching, rather than nonblanching or purpuric. It spreads to the
trunk within 6 to 18 hours and becomes petechial and purpuric over
the next two to four days.
Early recognition of the blanching macular eruption on the ankles,
wrists, and forehead is vital, because the classic petechial rash
associated with RMSF does not appear until approximately day six
after the initial symptoms. A skin biopsy at the first sign of a
rash can be helpful, although the diagnosis is usually a clinical
one. A fluorescent antibody technique can be used against frozen
sections of skin, which is specific but not sensitive. Ultimate
confirmation of the diagnosis is usually made through serology.
The indirect fluorescent antibody test detects IgM and IgG, which
typically appear 10 to 14 days after infection. A titer of 1:64
is considered diagnostic.
Rocky Mountain spotted fever is classically described as a triad
of a rash, fever, and a history of a tick bite. However, this triad
is present in only 3% to 18% of cases. As noted earlier, many patients
do not give a history of a tick bite, and in 10% to 20% of cases
no rash is present. These are clearly the most diagnostically challenging
cases with the highest percentage of fatal outcomes. Thrombocytopenia,
hyponatremia, and increased liver function tests can be helpful
clues when the diagnosis is uncertain. The presence of these laboratory
findings suggests more serious disease.
A recent article in the Archives of Internal Medicine noted
the following causes of delayed diagnosis, therapy, and poor outcome
in RMSF:
• waiting for a petechial rash to
develop before diagnosis;
• misdiagnosing the disease as gastroenteritis;
• ruling out the diagnosis because
there is no history of a tick bite;
• using an inappropriate geographic
exclusion;
• using an inappropriate seasonal
exclusion;
• failing to treat on clinical suspicion;
• failing to elicit an appropriate
history; and
• failing to treat with doxycycline.
Starting antibiotics on or before the fifth day of the illness
is an important factor in decreasing mortality. Treatment should
be initiated with doxycycline 100 mg twice a day orally or intravenously
for seven days or for two days after the fever subsides. Alternatively,
chloramphenicol can be started at 500 mg four times a day orally
or intravenously or at 50 to 100 mg/kg/day. Again the treatment
course is seven days or for two days after the fever subsides.
Rifampin and fluoroquinolones have been shown to have some activity
in vitro and possibly in vivo. Although tetracyclines are not generally
recommended in children under the age of nine, treatment with these
drugs in a life-threatening situation, while awaiting confirmation
of the diagnosis, is appropriate. In 1997, the American Academy
of Pediatrics revised its guidelines for treating children with
RMSF. Doxycycline became the preferred drug for treating children
(regardless of age) due to the morbidity and mortality associated
with the disease. Treatment with the tetracycline family of drugs
has been associated with higher survival rates. Short courses of
doxycycline to treat RMSF should not cause significant dental staining.
MENINGOCOCCEMIA
Meningococcemia is the leading cause of bacterial meningitis and
sepsis in children and young adults in the United States. Because
it is spread through respiratory secretions, people living in close
quarters with an infected individual are at increased risk. For
this reason, people who live in military barracks or college dormitories
or even those in the presence of an infected person during a commercial
airline flight of over eight hours' duration are at increased risk
for acquiring the infection. Given its potential for a rapidly fatal
outcome, it is vital that the clinician be familiar with the presentation
of this disease.
Acute meningococcemia is caused by the gram-negative diplococcus
Neisseria meningitidis. The incidence of the disease is higher
in late winter and early spring. Patients initially present with
nonspecific symptoms such as fever, nausea, vomiting, myalgias,
and headache. Subsequent development of meningitis in these patients
is indicated by nuchal rigidity and altered mental status with stupor
and obtundation.
Within hours these patients can develop hypotension as well as
a petechial eruption. Approximately 50% to 60% percent of patients
present with a characteristic petechial rash on the trunk and lower
extremities (see image below). However, lesions can also occur on
the head, palms, soles, and mucous membranes, although this is less
common and not characteristic. Petechial lesions are typically small
and irregular, with a characteristic smudged appearance; they may
also be raised with gun-metal-gray vesicular centers. This eruption
can progress to large areas of ecchymoses, bullous hemorrhagic plaques,
and frank necrosis. Although the petechial skin rash is more typical
of acute meningococcemia, on rare occasions patients may present
with a morbilliform, blanching, macular or papular eruption resembling
a viral exanthem.
 |
|
Meningococcemia. The petechial
lesions of meningococcemia, which appear most often
on the trunk and lower extremities, have a characteristic
smudged appearance.
Victor D. Newcomer Slide Collection
|
|
Young children without protective antibodies are at increased risk
for acquiring the infection. Frequent use of day care facilities
also puts children at increased risk. Patients who are immunosuppressed,
such as those with asplenia, HIV infection, hematologic malignancies,
and complement deficiencies, as well as those with concurrent upper
respiratory infections at the time of exposure, are at increased
risk as well.
Acute meningococcemia is a true medical emergency. The course of
the disease is rapid and often complicated by seizures, disseminated
intravascular coagulation, septic shock, bacterial endocarditis,
purulent pericarditis, and massive bilateral adrenal hemorrhage.
The diagnosis should be suspected in any patient presenting with
fever and a petechial rash with or without signs of meningitis;
it can be confirmed by demonstrating the bacteria on Gram's stain
and culture of blood and cerebrospinal fluid. A skin biopsy from
a petechial lesion does not reliably demonstrate the bacteria, so
it should not be done as an initial workup. There is greater yield
from an aspirate of a pustule or bulla, but care should be taken
in making a diagnosis because of the gram-negative flora normally
present on the skin.
Treatment of meningococcemia in adults is with penicillin G, 4
million units intravenously every four hours for five to seven days.
In penicillin-allergic patients, treatment can be initiated with
ceftriaxone or chloramphenicol. Nasal carriage rates in the general
population are between 5% and 10%, and the nasopharynx is the only
known human reservoir for the bacteria. Rifampin 600 mg twice a
day for two days should be given to patients after recovery to eliminate
nasal carriage. Alternatives include ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally
for one dose or ceftriaxone 250 mg intramuscularly for one dose.
The same course of rifampin, ciprofloxacin, or ceftriaxone should
be given to all close contacts of the infected individual, such
as household members and medical personnel. This chemoprophylaxis
should be initiated promptly; ideally, it should start within 14
days of exposure.
A quadrivalent polysaccharide vaccine is available in the United
States. Routine vaccination is not recommended due to the short
duration of the vaccine's efficacy and its relative ineffectiveness
in young children. The vaccine is recommended for use in control
of outbreaks of serogroup C meningitis, in certain immunosuppressed
individuals such as those with asplenia and terminal complement
deficiencies, and in people intending to travel to high-risk areas
such as sub-Saharan Africa.
back to top
NECROTIZING FASCIITIS
Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapidly progressive and often fatal
infection of the skin and underlying fascial planes (see image below).
It can initially present like cellulitis, so it is important that
this condition be considered in the differential diagnosis of cellulitis.
Rapid diagnosis and initiation of appropriate therapy can have a
significant effect on disease outcome and mortality.
 |
|
Necrotizing fasciitis. Cutaneous
findings probably gave little hint of the extent of
damage from necrotizing fasciitis in this patient, seen
here after surgical debridement was performed.
Victor D. Newcomer Slide Collection
|
|
Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapidly developing infection in which
patients present with erythema, edema, and extreme pain at the affected
site, as well as fever. Typically, within one to two days of disease
onset, patients develop a blue discoloration that may be associated
with a bullous eruption. The affected area can become frankly gangrenous
by day four to five of the illness. Unfortunately, the cutaneous
findings do not correlate with the extent of the underlying necrosis,
which is in fact more extensive than the cutaneous findings would
suggest because of the spread of the infection along fascial planes.
Eventual anesthesia of the skin is characteristic and represents
damage to the subcutaneous nerves as well as occlusion of small
blood vessels. Pain that is disproportionate to the clinical findings
can be an initial clue to the diagnosis. Anesthesia and the presence
of crepitance are later findings.
Necrotizing fasciitis can occur after surgical intervention or
deep penetrating trauma; it can also develop from extension of a
local skin infection or de novo. Individual risk factors include
diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and a history of drug or
alcohol abuse. However, this infection also commonly occurs in patients
without any predisposing illness. One form of the disease is caused
by group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus and the other by a polymicrobial
infection with anaerobic and aerobic bacteria.
Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion when a patient
presents with acute onset of severe pain, erythema, and edema, usually
of an extremity. Imaging studies such as conventional radiography,
magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography are helpful
in evaluating the depth of the infection and identifying the presence
of gas in the soft tissues. Additional studies that help confirm
the diagnosis include deep incisional biopsies that include fascia,
fine-needle aspirates, and aerobic and anaerobic cultures.
Treatment should include prompt intervention with surgical debridement
of the infected tissue, as well as appropriate intravenous antibiotics.
Initial antibiotic coverage should be broad, covering anaerobes
as well as aerobes until the specific causative organism is identified.
Without appropriate and timely therapy, patients can develop systemic
manifestations, including confusion, multiple organ failure, and
systemic shock. It has been shown that if therapy and surgical debridement
are initiated within four days of disease onset, the mortality rate
declines from 73% to 12%.
CUTANEOUS ANTHRAX
Until recently, cutaneous anthrax was primarily a disease of workers
employed in the animal products industry. After the terrorist-related
2001 outbreak, however, anthrax has become a disease that all physicians
should be aware of and should be confident in diagnosing.
Anthrax is caused by infection with Bacillus anthracis,
a large, encapsulated, spore-forming, gram-positive rod. Infection
with B. anthracis can take three clinical forms: cutaneous,
inhalational, and gastrointestinal. Here, we will focus on the presentation
of cutaneous anthrax.
Cutaneous anthrax has an incubation time of approximately one to
three days. The spore of the bacillus cannot penetrate intact epidermis,
so the initial papule will usually develop at a site of previous
trauma or abrasion to the epidermis. Lesions typically develop on
the head, neck, and upper extremities because these areas are more
prone to superficial trauma (see image). The initial lesion is an
erythematous papule, which then develops a boggy, edematous base
with a central vesicle or bulla that subsequently becomes hemorrhagic
and necrotic. Satellite vesicles and pustules may develop.
 |
|
Cutaneous anthrax. The initial
erythematous papule of anthrax later turns boggy, with
a hemorrhagic, necrotic central vesicle or bulla.
Victor D. Newcomer Slide Collection
|
|
It is important to note that the lesions of cutaneous anthrax are
painless. Patients may complain of burning or pruritus but not pain.
Regional adenitis and low-grade fever typically accompany the classic
cutaneous lesion, otherwise known as the "malignant pustule." In
a subset of patients with cutaneous anthrax, the clinical presentation
is more serious. These patients experience more severe constitutional
symptoms, with high fevers and prostration as well as multiple hemorrhagic
and necrotic plaques.
The diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax can be made by culture of either
the vesicular fluid or the aspirate from beneath a necrotic eschar.
Gram's stain of a smear from the above fluids can support the diagnosis
initially, but a culture is needed to definitively identify the
organism. Because nonpathogenic gram-positive bacilli can be confused
with B. anthracis, a specific gamma bacteriophage is used
to identify the infectious organism. Cultures from patients taking
antibiotics are unlikely to yield positive results. In these cases,
a skin biopsy from the edge of the lesion should be taken. Silver
staining and immunohistochemical stains should then be used to identify
the organism. Additionally, blood cultures should be sent. The organism
can occasionally be cultured from the blood of patients with cutaneous
anthrax.
The primary differential diagnosis for cutaneous anthrax includes
staphylococcal infection, brown recluse spider bite, herpes simplex
infection, and ecthyma. These should easily be differentiated due
to the absence of pain and tenderness in cutaneous anthrax lesions.
A recent article in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
further outlined the algorithm for the management of cutaneous anthrax:
• Notify your local department of
health of a suspected case of anthrax.
• Maintain universal precautions,
although wearing a mask is not required.
• Obtain sterile Dacron or rayon (not
cotton-tipped) swabs of vesicular fluid or from the base of an eschar
for gram stain and culture.
• Obtain a full-thickness, 4-mm, punch
biopsy specimen for histology, immunohistochemistry, and polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) from the edge of either a vesicle or eschar
(or preferably both, if present).
• Draw one 5-ml tube of blood into
a red-topped tube and label it "anthrax serology."
• Draw one 5-ml tube of blood into
a purple-topped tube for possible PCR by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
• Obtain blood cultures from febrile
or hospitalized patients.
• Initiate appropriate treatment.
Recommended treatment for cutaneous anthrax has typically been
with penicillin. However, there is cause for concern here because
an inducible penicillinase has been found with recent genomic sequencing
of anthrax isolates. Isolates from the 2001 outbreak have been shown
to be susceptible to quinolones, tetracyclines, rifampin, clindamycin,
and aminoglycosides, among other drugs. First-line therapy for cutaneous
anthrax in adults without associated systemic symptoms includes
ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice a day or doxycycline 100 mg twice a day.
Susceptibility testing should be done to direct further treatment.
Traditionally, a treatment course was 7 to 14 days or until the
associated edema had resolved. However, it should be noted that
patients affected by the 2001 outbreak, including those with cutaneous
anthrax, were treated for a total of 60 days. There is also an anthrax
vaccine. It has been shown that post-exposure treatment is optimized
with administration of the vaccine, along with the appropriate antibiotic
therapy.
back to top
STEVENS-JOHNSON SYNDROME AND TOXIC
EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS
Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)
can be thought of as essentially the same disease, differing only
in severity. Both SJS and TEN are mucocutaneous reactions that have
been classified arbitrarily by how much body surface area is involved.
Stevens-Johnson syndrome involves less than 10% of body surface
area, while TEN involves more than 30%. Cases involving between
10% and 30% of body surface area are designated as SJS-TEN overlap.
The incidence of both SJS and TEN is rare; estimates range from
approximately one to two cases per million per year.
Drugs are the primary cause in 80% to 95% of TEN cases and 50%
of SJS cases. More than 100 medications have been reported to cause
SJS and TEN. The task of finding the implicated agent may seem daunting.
However, there are medications that have been shown to be more commonly
implicated. Medications containing sulfa moieties, for example,
are at the top of the list. Because these drugs are commonly used
for prophylaxis and treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia
in HIV-infected individuals, they are playing an increasingly common
role in the induction of SJS and TEN. This is compounded by the
fact that HIV-infected patients as a group tend to be more susceptible
to the development of SJS or TEN. Anticonvulsive agents such as
phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital are commonly implicated
agents, as are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, allopurinol,
and antibiotics such as cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and penicillins.
Though medications lead the list of causative factors, infections
have also been implicated in SJS and TEN, particularly Mycoplasma
pneumoniae infection and infection with hepatitis A, Epstein-Barr
virus, adenovirus, and coxsackievirus. Acute graft-versus-host disease
has also been shown to be a causative factor. Unfortunately, the
development of TEN in acute graft-versus-host disease has a 100%
mortality rate. Both SJS and TEN may also result from idiopathic
causes.
Patients typically present with a prodrome of fever and other constitutional
symptoms between 1 to 14 days before the onset of the rash. An eruption
then starts on the face, neck, and trunk and rapidly spreads to
the extremities. The eruption typically appears as pink macules
or targetoid lesions that resemble pink patches with dusky centers.
The skin is typically painful and tender to touch. Nikolsky's sign
(extension of bullae with lateral pressure) is positive in these
patients. Lesions typically coalesce and may form hemorrhagic or
flaccid bullae. Areas of skin may begin to denude, leaving large
red erosions (see image below). This typically occurs first at areas
of pressure and trauma.
 |
|
Toxic epidermal necrolysis. In
this rare, usually drug-induced disorder, large areas
of denuded skin may develop, especially in areas subject
to pressure or trauma.
Victor D. Newcomer Slide Collection
|
|
In severe cases of TEN, loss of fingernails, toenails, and eyebrows
may occur. Development of the skin rash is paralleled by mucosal
involvement. Typically, the oral mucosa, including the vermilion
border of the lip, is involved, heralded by large areas of hemorrhagic
crusting. This is usually accompanied by involvement of the conjunctiva
and, less commonly, the anogenital mucosa.
The diagnosis can be made by performing a skin biopsy. In severe
cases, frozen sections of the biopsy specimen are warranted for
a more timely diagnosis. Treatment of these patients depends on
the amount of body surface area involved. In cases of TEN with more
than 30% of body surface involvement, transfer to a burn unit may
be appropriate. These patients also require more extensive medical
care; they may have internal organ involvement and electrolyte abnormalities
and may develop hemodynamic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome,
seizures, myocardial infarction, and obtundation leading to a comatose
state.
An extensive investigation should be made to eliminate the likely
causative factor. It is very important to discontinue the implicated
drug as soon as possible. Associated infections should be treated
if they are suspected to be the underlying cause. Traditionally,
treatment of patients with TEN involved systemic corticosteroids,
but this has become controversial and many physicians are choosing
not to treat patients in this manner. Intravenous immunoglobulin
(IVIG) has been shown to be very promising in the treatment of TEN
and SJS. Preliminary studies have shown that early treatment with
IVIG at 1 g/kg/day for three days has greatly improved outcomes
in patients. However, it should be noted that other studies have
failed to show a benefit.
Mortality rates differ depending on disease severity. For SJS,
the mortality rates range from 1% to 5%; for TEN, they are considerably
higher, ranging from 5% to 50%. Poor prognostic factors include
extensive skin involvement, old age, neutropenia, history of polypharmacy,
and impaired renal function.
LIFESAVING DIAGNOSIS
Prompt diagnosis and treatment can greatly affect outcome in these
rapidly developing and possibly fatal dermatologic emergencies.
By being familiar with the clinical presentations of these diseases,
particularly cutaneous signs and symptoms, the clinician can initiate
the appropriate workup and make a timely and potentially lifesaving
diagnosis.
back to top
|
Suggested Reading
Bachot N, et al.: Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for
Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a
prospective noncomparative study showing no benefit on mortality
or progression. Arch Dermatol 139(1):33, 2003.
Callahan EF: Cutaneous (non-HIV) infections. Dermatol Clin
18(3):497, 2000.
Carucci JA, et al.: Cutaneous anthrax management algorithm.
J Am Acad Dermatol 47(5):766, 2002.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Update: investigation
of bioterrorism-related anthrax and interim guidelines for
exposure management and antimicrobial therapy. MMWR 50(42):909,
2001.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevention and
control of meningococcal disease. MMWR Recomm Rep 49(RR-7):1,
2000.
Dahl PR, et al.: Fulminant group A streptococcal necrotizing
fasciitis: clinical and pathologic findings in 7 patients.
J Am Acad Dermatol 47(4):489, 2002.
Masters EJ, et al.: Rocky Mountain spotted fever: a clinician's
dilemma. Arch Intern Med 163(7):769, 2003.
Prins C, et al.: Treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis
with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins: multicenter retrospective
analysis of 48 consecutive cases. Arch Dermatol 139(1):26,
2003.
Sexton DJ, et al.: Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Med Clin
North Am 86(2): 2002.
Singh-Behl D: Tick-borne infections. Dermatol Clin 21(2):237,
2003.
|
|