|

Assessing and Treating Community-Acquired
Pneumonia
The author explains current guidelines for determining
the severity of pneumoniaalways the key to successful treatmentand
provides an update on the problem of antibiotic resistance, which
now extends to the fluoroquinolones.
By Thomas J. Marrie, MD
| Dr. Marrie is a professor and chair in the
department of medicine at the University of Alberta in Edmonton,
Alberta. |
A 48-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with
a 48-hour history of anorexia, fever, chills, and cough and an 18-hour
history of left pleuritic chest pain. Her history was significant
for use of methylphenidate and acetaminophen intravenously. On examination
she looked acutely ill and seemed to be confused. Her oral temperature
was 102.2°F; pulse, 110; respiratory rate, 30; and blood pressure,
90/60 mm Hg. Oxygen saturation was 89%.
Crackles were present on auscultation of the left lung. Her chest
x-ray showed an opacified left upper lobe, a nodular opacity in
the right lower lung field, and an interstitial pattern throughout
both lung fields. The interstitial pattern was present on old chest
films dating back at least two years. Given the history of injection
drug use, the physician examining her surmised that the interstitial
pattern was most likely talc lung. He also concluded that the right
lower lobe nodule represented a nipple shadow. That left only the
left upper lobe opacity, which was most likely due to pneumonia.
 |
|
Case example of resistant
pneumonia. This 48-year-old woman presented with
left-sided pleuritic pain, tachypnea, fever of 102.2°F,
and other signs of serious illness. The opacity of her
left upper lobe in this x-ray represented infection
with S. pneumoniae that was not susceptible to
penicillin. Her diffuse interstitial infiltration was
ascribed to talc lung from injection drug use, and the
nodular opacity in the lower right lung field was presumed
a nipple shadow.
|
|
CHALLENGING PATIENT
This patient poses a number of challenges. It is evident that she
is very ill. Attention has to be paid to stabilizing her respiratory
and circulatory systems, and a decision needs to be made as to whether
she should be transferred to a medical/surgical floor or an intensive
care unit (ICU). In addition, antibiotic therapy must be started
immediately. The question is, which antibiotic or antibiotics?
Two sets of blood cultures should be obtained before antibiotic
therapy is started. The yield from blood cultures in patients with
pneumonia ranges from 6% to 20%. If the patient can produce sputum,
it should be sent for culture too. However, antibiotic therapy should
not be delayed until the patient can produce sputum.
In this patient, it is important to obtain sputum for culture.
Since she is an intravenous drug user, she is at risk for HIV infection
and, if she is HIV-positive, she would be at a higher risk than
other patients for tuberculosis and Pneumocystis carinii
infection. The sputum specimen should be cultured for Mycobacterium
tuberculosis in addition to the usual respiratory pathogens. If
sputum can be obtained, a Gram's stain may give an immediate indication
of the most likely infecting pathogen.
ASSESSING THE SEVERITY OF THE PNEUMONIA
The key to the successful treatment of any patient with pneumonia
is an accurate assessment of the severity of the illness. The Infectious
Diseases Society of America, the Canadian Infectious Diseases and
Canadian Thoracic Society, and the American Thoracic Society (ATS)
have all published guidelines for empirical antimicrobial therapy
of community-acquired pneumonia. All three sets of guidelines use
the severity of the pneumonia as the basis for selecting antibiotics.
The rank order of the pathogens differs according to the severity
of the pneumonia (see table below). Since the ATS guidelines are
the most recent, they will be used to guide therapy for the patient
presented here. However, the clinician's first task is to determine
the severity of the pneumonia.
|
Most Common
Causes of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
|
| |
Ambulatory
pneumonia
|
Pneumonia treated on
medical/surgical unit
|
Pneumonia treated in
intensive care unit
|
| |
M. pneumoniae
C. pneumoniae
S. pneumoniae
H. influenzae
Influenza viruses
Adenovirus |
S. pneumoniae
H. influenzae
C. pneumoniae
S. aureus
Mixed etiology
Legionella species
Viral
M. catarrhalis
Aerobic gram-negative bacilli
|
S. pneumoniae
Legionella species
Mixed
S. aureus
Viral
H. influenzae |
|
The British Thoracic Society (BTS) specifies four criteria for
pneumonia severity (see box below). If none of these criteria is
present, the mortality rate is 2.4%; if one is present, the rate
is 8%; with two, it is 23%; with three, 33%; with four, 83%. Our
patient has three of the four criteria (her urea level is not back
from the laboratory yet). Thus, based on the BTS criteria, her pneumonia
has a high mortality rate and she should be admitted to the ICU.
|
British Thoracic
Society Criteria for
Assessing Pneumonia Severity*
|
| |
Confusion (recent onset)
Urea level >7 mmol/L
Respiratory rate >30/minute
Blood pressure: diastolic <60 mm Hg or
systolic <90 mm Hg
|
| |
|
|
The BTS criteria are easy to remember and are therefore used most
often. The ATS criteria for severe pneumonia are listed below (see
box below). An oxygen saturation of 89% probably translates to a
PaO2 of less than 60 mm Hg, so our patient meets three
of the four criteria and should be admitted to the ICU.
|
American Thoracic
Society Criteria for
Assessing Pneumonia Severity*
|
| |
Respiratory rate >30/minute
PaO2/FIO2 <250 mm Hg or PaO2 <60 mm Hg
Bilateral or multilobe infiltrates on chest x-ray
Blood pressure: systolic <90 or diastolic <60 mm Hg
|
| |
|
It should be kept in mind, however, that any severity of illness
scoring system represents an assessment of a patient's condition
at a single point in time. A patient's condition is dynamic, not
static. Also, a physician must always use his or her best judgment,
in addition to laboratory findings and any other available data,
in making decisions as to a patient's care. Even if this patient
met only two of the BTS or ATS criteria, it would be prudent to
admit her to an ICU because she appears very ill clinically.
back to top
TREATMENT GUIDELINES
If we accept that this patient has severe pneumonia and consult
the ATS guidelines for treating pneumonia (see box below), then
the next step is to decide whether she has risk factors for Pseudomonas
aeruginosa. She does not have bronchiectasis and has not received
corticosteroids or antibiotics within the previous three months.
However, she looks malnourished so treatment is begun with imipenem
and ciprofloxacin.
|
American Thoracic
Society Guidelines
for Treating Pneumonia Patients
Who Require Admission to an ICU
|
| |
• |
No risk factors for P. aeruginosa pneumonia*
Intravenous (IV) beta-lactam (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime)
plus IV azithromycin or IV fluoroquinolone
|
| |
• |
Risk factors for P. aeruginosa pneumonia present
Intravenous anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam (cefipime, imipenem,
meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam) plus
IV anti-pseudomonal fluoroquinolone |
| |
Or |
Intravenous anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam plus IV aminoglycoside
plus IV azithromycin or IV nonpseudomonal fluoroquinolone
|
| |
|
The next day, blood cultures are reported to be growing Streptococcus
pneumoniae, and a day later the antibiotic susceptibilities
are provided by the laboratory. The minimal inhibitory concentration
(MIC) of penicillin is 2 mcg/ml. Thus, this patient has pneumonia
due to a penicillin-nonsusceptible isolate of S. pneumoniae.
Isolates with an MIC of 0.06 mcg/ml or lower are susceptible; those
with an MIC of 0.12 to 1 mcg/ml are of intermediate susceptibility;
and those with an MIC of 2 mcg/ml or higher are resistant. Recently,
penicillin resistance has been redefined so that for infections
that do not involve the central nervous system (CNS), an MIC of
4 mcg/ml or higher is considered resistant. So our patient has a
nonsusceptible isolate.
Imipenem is active against penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae,
but ciprofloxacin is not. Therefore, treatment with imipenem continues
and the ciprofloxacin is stopped. There are some data from an observational
study suggesting that the mortality rate from bacteremic pneumococcal
pneumonia is lower when two antibiotics that are effective against
S. pneumoniae are used. However, by now our patient has markedly
improved so treatment is continued with imipenem only.
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PENICILLIN-RESISTANT
S. PNEUMONIAE
About 20% of the isolates of S. pneumoniae in Canada are
penicillin resistant; in the United States, the figure is 24%. There
is geographic variation in the rate of pneumococcal resistance.
In Georgia, for example, about 33% of the isolates are penicillin
resistant. Risk factors for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae
are age under 5 or over 65, beta-lactam therapy within the past
three months, alcoholism, immunosuppressive therapy (including corticosteroid
therapy), multiple illnesses, and exposure to a child in a day care
center.
Isolates that are resistant to penicillin are often resistant to
other antibiotics. In the United States, resistance to three or
more classes of antibiotics increased from 9% to 14% between 1995
and 1998. Currently, about 30% of S. pneumoniae isolates
are resistant to macrolides, 30% to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole,
16% to tetracycline, 8% to clindamycin, and 1% to fluoroquinolones.
Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common cause of community-acquired
pneumonia, accounting for about 50% of pneumonia cases requiring
admission to a hospital. It also accounts for a significant proportion
of cases of community-acquired pneumonia that do not require hospitalization.
Thus, the risk of drug-resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP) must
be evaluated in every patient with pneumonia. For patients who are
going to be treated on an ambulatory basis and in whom there is
a risk of DRSP, the antibiotics listed in the box on page 27 are
all acceptable choices.
Amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulinic acid, ceftriaxone, and cefditoren
all have the same MIC as penicillin for any given isolate. For cefpodoxime,
cefuroxime, and cefdinir, the MICs are two times higher; for cefprozil,
four times higher; for cefixime and ceftibuten, 16 times higher;
and for cefaclor, 32 times higher. This suggests that some beta-lactam
antibiotics should not be used to treat patients with DRSP. It is
true that many beta-lactams in high doses are effective against
DRSP because of the high concentrations of these drugs that can
be achieved in the lung. However, if there is concomitant meningitis,
vancomycin and ceftriaxone should be used because with higher MICs,
therapeutic concentrations of the beta-lactam may not be achieved
in the CNS. In general, the drug concentration in the CNS required
to treat an infection is ten times the MIC.
MECHANISMS OF RESISTANCE
There are two mechanisms of resistance to macrolides in S. pneumoniae.
One is due to an efflux pump that moves the macrolide out of the
bacterial cell; the other is due to an alteration of the target
site. The first mechanism is a relative resistance, and since macrolides
concentrate in alveolar macrophages, the significance of this type
of resistance is unclear. However, alteration of the target site
results in absolute resistance, with MICs of 64 mcg/ml or higher.
In North America, the efflux type of resistance is more common than
the target-site type.
Resistance to the fluoroquinolones is beginning to emerge. The
major risk factor for fluoroquinolone resistance is prior treatment
with ciprofloxacin, especially in patients with chronic obstructive
lung disease, who often receive multiple courses of the drug. Patients
who have received a fluoroquinolone in the past three months should
not be given an antibiotic in this class as empiric therapy. Ciprofloxacin
and levofloxacin are about equal in activity against S. pneumoniae,
gatifloxacin is three times more active, and moxifloxacin is 10
times more active when the MIC and area under the concentration
curve are considered. However, if an isolate of S. pneumoniae
is resistant to one of the fluoroquinolones, it may be resistant
to all of them.
|
Guidelines
for Treating Pneumonia
Patients on an Ambulatory Basis*
|
| |
• |
Oral beta-lactam alone (cefpodoxime 200 mg 2x/d,
cefuroxime axetil 750 mg 3x/d, amoxicillin 1000 mg
3x/d, amoxicillin-clavulinic acid 875/125 mg 3x/d) or
with a macrolide or doxycycline
|
| |
• |
Oral fluoroquinolone with enhanced activity against
S. pneumoniae (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, or
gatifloxacin). Levofloxacin dose is 500 mg/d. (If
creatinine clearance is <50 ml/min, dose should be
reduced to 250 mg/d.) Moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin
doses are 400 mg/d.
|
| |
• |
Oral telithromycin 800 mg/d
|
| |
|
It is noteworthy that the BTS guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired
pneumonia on an ambulatory basis recommend amoxicillin alone as
the drug of choice. North American guidelines emphasize coverage
of atypical agents such as M. pneumoniae and hence have recommended
macrolides or doxycycline as first-line agents for ambulatory pneumonia.
It is very possible that the advent of DRSP in North America will
mean a return to monotherapy with a beta-lactam for this condition.
This is based on the observation that with the exception of pneumonia
due to the Legionella species, atypical pneumonias are mild,
affect younger individuals, and may not be susceptible to the influence
of specific antibiotics on the course of the illness.
back to top
|
Suggested Reading
British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee: BTS
guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia
in adults. Thorax 56(4):iv1, 2001.
Fang GD, et al.: New and emerging etiologies for community-acquired
pneumonia with implications for therapy. A prospective multicenter
study of 359 cases. Medicine 69(5):307, 1990.
Garau J: Treatment of drug-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia.
Lancet Infect Dis 2(7):404, 2002.
Niederman MS, et al.: Guidelines for the management of adults
with community-acquired pneumonia. Diagnosis, assessment of
severity, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med 163(7):1730, 2001.
Whitney CG, et al.: Increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant
Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. N Engl J Med
343(26):1917, 2000.
|
|