|

Rash Decisions
Contributed by readers Edited by Sheldon Jacobson, MD
A 22-year-old man presented to the walk-in clinic of a community
health center, complaining of an itchy rash in his groin that he
claimed to have had for more than a year. During that time, he had
tried several topical medications, including repeated treatments
with steroid and antifungal creams, none of which provided any relief.
A review of the patient's chart documented multiple visits to the
clinic for groin itch during the preceding year. He had been seen
by a variety of clinicians, including family practitioners, internists,
and a dermatologist. Among the several diagnoses that had been made
were tinea curis, lichen simplex chronicus, and eczema.
On physical examination, the patient was a healthy-looking man.
He had no other relevant medical history. He reported no allergies
and was not taking any medications. The clinician who examined him
discovered that he had, in fact, no rash, and asked exactly what
was bothering him. The patient pointed to "bumps" that he perceived
were present on completely normal-appearing scrotal skin.
In further discussion, the patient revealed that the itching in
his groin provoked feelings of anger and frustration. These emotions
were so overwhelming that he regularly "broke things," he said,
in order to relieve his tension. He described having temper tantrums
one to three times a week.
The patient was referred to a psychiatrist, who prescribed an antipsychotic
medication. On follow-up two weeks later, the patient happily reported
that his symptoms had improved for the first time in the history
of his condition.
COMMENT
This patient fell victim to two common failings of the medical
profession. First, the busy physicians who saw him for his seemingly
simple complaint did not review his chart. Thus, they repeatedly
misdiagnosed his problem despite ample documentation of previous
ineffective treatments. Second, mental illness was never considered
in the differential diagnosisdespite the total absence of
any physical manifestation of the purported symptom. The obsessive
quality of his thinking, coupled with his anger and temper tantrums,
were important clues that were missed by multiple physicians. Somatic
complaints that have no basis in reality can be the presenting symptom
for many psychiatric disorders. In their haste to treat what appeared
(by narration, not demonstration) to be a straightforward complaint,
these physicians missed the more subtle underlying problem.
Of course, one must consider that there are a number of organic
causes of pruritus without a rash, including diabetes mellitus,
polycythemia vera, HIV, liver or kidney failure, and most commonly,
xerosis (dry skin). These entities should be ruled out before ascribing
pruritus to purely emotional factors.
|
Dr. Jacobson is professor and chairman of
the department of emergency medicine at Mount Sinai Medical
Center in New York City and a member of the Emergency Medicine
editorial board.
Emerg Med 35(6):59, 2003
|
|