|

Clostridium difficile Colitis
The authors review risk factors, variants of presentation,
differential diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of this increasingly
prevalent antibiotic-associated illness.
By Gavin F. Chico, MD, and Michelle A. Chico,
MD
Clostridium difficile is now recognized as a frequent cause
of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis. Since 1978, when
the association between the toxin produced by the organism and pseudomembranous
colitis was first reported, the incidence of C. difficile
infection has dramatically increased. In the United States, C.
difficile-related infections, which predominantly occur in hospitalized
patients, cause up to three million cases of diarrhea and colitis
per year. On an outpatient basis, around 20,000 cases per year have
been reported.
Clostridium difficile can cause a wide spectrum of conditions,
from an asymptomatic carrier state to diarrhea without colitis to
C. difficile-associated colitis (CDC).
What are the risk factors for CDC?
Although antibiotic-associated colitis can result from pathogens
such as Salmonella, Clostridium perfringens type A, and Staphylococcus
aureus, C. difficile has been implicated in 50% to 75% of antibiotic-associated
colitis, with 90% of those cases being of the more serious pseudomembranous
type. Clostridium difficile colitis is one of the most common
nosocomial infections, resulting in much morbidity and mortality.
The patients most susceptible to CDC are those who are elderly or
debilitated (especially hospitalized patients), have been exposed
to multiple antibiotics, have had gastrointestinal surgery, or are
severely ill on hospital admission.
In addition, proton pump inhibitors appear to increase the risk
of acquiring CDC by reducing the acid concentration in the stomach
and allowing the organism to pass unharmed into the intestine. Patient-to-patient
transmission increases the risk of acquiring CDC. Patients with
an infected roommate are more likely to get CDC than patients without
an infected roommate. Transmission of infection by hospital personnel
contaminated with C. difficile is possible but preventable
by using disposable gloves and washing hands thoroughly after examining
patients.
The initial event leading to CDC is the disturbance of the normal
colonic microflora by antibiotic therapy. The antibiotics that predispose
to CDC are listed in the table below. With the alteration of colonic
microflora, there is subsequent exposure to and colonization of
C. difficile, a gram-positive anaerobic organism. Once colonized,
pathogenic strains of C. difficile release toxins that cause
mucosal inflammation and damage. The two distinct toxins are toxin
A, which is an enterotoxin, and toxin B, which is a cytotoxin. Both
these toxins are high-molecular-weight proteins that bind to specific
receptors on the intestinal mucosa. Once bound to these receptors,
the toxins inactivate Rho proteins intracellularly, which leads
to actin filament disintegration.
|
Antibiotics
Associated with C. difficile Colitis
|
| |
Frequently |
Infrequently |
Rarely |
| |
cephalosporins |
sulfonamides |
metronidazole |
| |
ampicillin, amoxicillin |
tetracyclines |
vancomycin |
| |
clindamycin |
macrolides |
aminoglycosides |
| |
|
quinolones |
|
|
When the actin filaments disintegrate, the cells round off and
are sloughed from the basement membrane, leading to a shallow ulcer
on the mucosal surface of the bowel lumen. These ulcers may be scattered
or diffuse and may or may not develop a pseudomembrane. Pseudomembranes
develop when serum proteins, mucus, and inflammatory cells flow
from the ulcer and form a membranous layer covering it. They may
be confined only to the epithelium and adjacent lamina propria,
in mild cases; in severe cases, they involve the full thickness
of the mucosa, with necrosis and confluent pseudomembrane formation.
The pseudomembrane appears as a yellow or off-white raised plaque.
In addition to these ulcers and pseudomembranes, the entire bowel
wall may become edematous and hyperemic from inflammation.
What are the clinical manifestations of CDC?
Clostridium difficile diarrhea without colitis is the most
common manifestation of C. difficile infection. The more
serious Clostridium difficile colitis accounts for much of
the morbidity and mortality associated with C. difficile.
The CDC spectrum includes colitis without pseudomembrane formation,
pseudomembranous colitis, and fulminant colitis. The basis for this
varied response is related to host factors such as the immune response,
the presence of colonic receptors for the toxins, and the concentration
of antitoxin antibodies in the sera and intestinal secretions.
Patients with CDC almost always require therapeutic intervention.
The illness seldom resolves spontaneously, unlike most cases of
C. difficile diarrhea without colitis, which do resolve when
the offending antibiotic is withdrawn. While CDC occurs mainly during
or shortly after antibiotic usage, infections can occur up to six
months after antibiotic exposure.
Following are key presenting characteristics of the CDC variants.
C. difficile colitis without pseudomembrane formation.
These patients have 10 or more loose bowel movements per day, with
only occasional occult bleeding per rectum. The diarrhea is more
profuse compared to patients without colitis, and it is associated
with cramping abdominal pain in the lower quadrant that is temporarily
relieved with passage of loose bowel movements. Patients may have
accompanying symptoms of nausea, anorexia, fever, and malaise. On
physical exam, they may have signs of dehydration with abdominal
distension and tenderness.
Pseudomembranous colitis. These patients have more
profuse diarrhea than patients without pseudomembranes, and their
systemic symptoms of nausea, anorexia, fever, and malaise are more
intense. On clinical exam, they may be more dehydrated and have
marked abdominal tenderness and distension.
Fulminant colitis. These patients have severe diarrhea
but may also have decreased bowel movements if paralytic ileus intervenes.
They are lethargic with high fever, chills, tachycardia, and profound
systemic manifestations of the disease such as severe dehydration.
They may present with an acute abdomen and have peritoneal signs
if there is perforation. This fulminant process can lead to megacolon,
ileus, perforation, and death. Patients with toxic megacolon have
a dilated colon, with a diameter greater than 7 cm, accompanied
by severe systemic toxicity such as marked leukocytosis, dehydration,
and metabolic acidosis. Patients with bowel perforation often have
abdominal rigidity, reduced bowel sounds, and in some cases, symptoms
of shock.
C. difficile colitis with protein-losing enteropathy.
This is an additional variant that occurs in a small number of patients,
who usually have subacute CDC with low-grade, intermittent diarrhea,
abdominal pain, and fever. Such patients have hypoalbuminemia secondary
to the pancolitis, which causes leaking of serum albumin through
the inflamed mucosa. The serum albumin may be as low as 2 g/dl or
less, with accompanying ascites and peripheral edema.
Most of the manifestations of CDC are related to the colon, but
infection of the small bowel and extraintestinal manifestations
such as reactive arthritis can occasionally occur.
How is CDC recognizable in patients with
inflammatory bowel disease?
Clostridium difficile colitis in a patient with inflammatory
bowel disease may be missed because the symptoms of diarrhea, abdominal
pain, and low-grade fever are attributed to a flare-up of the underlying
disease process. The diagnosis, however, can be established by identifying
the cytotoxin in the stool sample.
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at risk of acquiring
CDC because they have impaired immune systems, are exposed to antibiotics,
including sulfasalazine, and are frequently hospitalized due to
the underlying disease process.
What is the differential diagnosis for CDC?
In addition to CDC, diagnostic considerations for patients presenting
with fever, diarrhea, and abdominal pain include diverticulitis,
inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease),
and bacterial colitis.
While patients with diverticulitis have fever and abdominal pain,
they usually will not have profuse diarrhea. On exam, there is usually
left lower quadrant tenderness with a palpable mass.
Patients with ulcerative colitis usually have bloody diarrhea with
fecal urgency. In severe disease, there is associated hypoalbuminemia
and severe anemia. Stool cultures are negative. Patients may also
have extraintestinal manifestations such as erythema nodosum, episcleritis,
and oligoarthritis. In Crohn's, patients may present with intermittent
diarrhea with cramping or steady right lower quadrant pain. On exam,
a right lower quadrant mass may be palpable. Patients may have evidence
of fistulas and abscesses in the perineum or intra-abdominally.
Besides C. difficile, bacterial colitis can be caused by
Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Yersinia,
and Escherichia coli. Patients with Salmonella, Shigella,
or Campylobacter usually have a self-limiting diarrhea that
can be differentiated from CDC by stool culture. Patients with E.
coli colitis have diarrhea that may be bloody when provoked
by enteroinvasive or enterohemorrhagic E. coli strains. Outbreaks
of enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7 that occur from consumption
of undercooked hamburgers and unpasteurized apple juice can result
in complications such as hemolytic-uremic syndrome and thrombotic
thrombocytopenic purpura. Isolation of E. coli O157:H7 requires
identifying this strain on sorbitol-MacConkey agar and confirming
it with serologic typing.
Other processes that should be considered in the differential diagnosis
are viral gastroenteritis, malabsorption, and irritable bowel syndrome.
What diagnostic tests are useful in identifying
CDC? Does endoscopy have a role?
Depending on the severity of the illness, patients with CDC may
have leukocytosis with a left shift, electrolyte abnormalities,
and even hypoalbuminemia in severe cases. Stool examination will
reveal leukocytes in half the cases and may even be hemoccult positive.
The diagnosis of CDC is established most often by stool bioassay,
but in certain patient populations, endoscopy and abdominal CT scans
are done to obtain additional information.
Stool bioassay. The stool cytotoxicity assay is the
test of choice for diagnosing CDC. Diarrheal stool is diluted with
buffer, then filtered and added to fibroblasts. The toxins exert
a cytopathic effect on the cells that causes rounding. The test
is usually reported as positive or negative and titers, if reported,
are of little importance. Sensitivity is 94% to 100%, and specificity
is up to 99%. Cytotoxicity assays are expensive and take two to
three days to complete, so they have been largely replaced by rapid
and easier-to-perform immunoassays such as ELISA, which detect toxin
A. Although cytotoxicity assays and immunoassays are comparable
in specificity, the sensitivity of cytotoxicity assays is greater,
resulting in detection of 5% to 10% more cases. This is mainly due
to negative ELISA assay results seen in patients with stool containing
toxin B and mutant toxin A.
Endoscopy. Though sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy are
seldom performed in patients with classic clinical findings, they
are helpful when the diagnosis is in doubt or rapid diagnostic information
is required. If a patient is ill with symptoms suggestive of CDC
but has a negative ELISA assay, then colonoscopy can be invaluable
in providing an expeditious diagnosis. The presence of pseudomembranes
is virtually diagnostic of CDC. In general, colonoscopy is superior
to sigmoidoscopy because in 10% of patients, CDC is rectosigmoid-sparing.
The findings with colonoscopy vary from diffuse, patchy colitis
in mild cases to the characteristic raised, adherent, yellow plaques
seen in pseudomembranous colitis. Other endoscopic findings include
erythema, edema, friability, and erosions.
Computed tomography (CT) scan. The CT scan of the
abdomen is used to evaluate for other intra-abdominal pathology.
The findings of mild CDC include diffuse or patchy colitis. In pseudomembranous
colitis, they include mucosal edema, thickened colon, thumbprinting,
pancolitis, and even pericolonic inflammation, depending on the
severity of the disease. These findings are not specific for CDC,
as they may be seen in colitis from other causes. A CT scan may
be helpful, however, in revealing complications of CDC such as ileus
and megacolon and identifying any other intra-abdominal pathology.
What therapies are effective in resolving
CDC?
The initial step in management of CDC is to discontinue the offending
antibiotics. Supportive measures, such as intravenous (IV) fluids
and correcting electrolyte imbalances, should be instituted.
Antiperistaltic agents such as diphenoxylate plus atropine, opiates,
or loperamide should be avoided because they can delay the clearance
of the toxin and exacerbate toxin-mediated colonic injury. Such
agents may also precipitate ileus and cause toxic dilation of the
colon.
Since the diarrhea in CDC is usually profuse, specific therapy
with oral metronidazole or vancomycin is usually warranted. Metronidazole
has been found to be effective in 98% of patients treated. It is
as effective as vancomycin both in initial treatment of CDC and
in patients who relapse. If IV antibiotic therapy is required, only
metronidazole should be used. It achieves bactericidal levels in
the bowel lumen whether given orally or intravenously, in contrast
to vancomycin, which does so only when given orally.
The systemic side effects of metronidazole are uncommon and include
nausea, vomiting, and a disulfiram-like reaction with alcohol. It
should be given with caution to pregnant and nursing women due to
the unknown effects on fetal organogenesis. Resistant C. difficile
isolates have occasionally been reported, as have cases of metronidazole-induced
C. difficile diarrhea and colitis.
Vancomycin is effective in more than 96% of patients treated. Since
it is neither absorbed nor metabolized when given orally, it reaches
high intraluminal concentrations, making it very effective in treating
both mild and severe CDC. Doses of 125 mg four times daily suffice
for treating milder forms of the disease; higher doses such as 500
mg may be needed in patients who have severe or fulminant colitis.
Vancomycin can be administered orally, by nasogastric tube, or by
enema. Again, it should not be given intravenously because effective
intraluminal concentrations cannot be achieved by that route.
There are only rare cases of systemic adverse effects from oral
vancomycin because it is not absorbed from the lumen when given
orally. Despite these advantages of vancomycin, it is used as second-line
therapy because it is costly and because its use may encourage the
growth of deadly vancomycin-resistant nosocomial bacteria. Vancomycin
is usually given to patients who cannot tolerate metronidazole,
pregnant women, children less than 10 years of age, and in cases
of severe pseudomembranous colitis.
For a quick-reference comparison of the two agents, see the table,
below.
|
Metronidazole
vs. Vancomycin
|
| |
|
Metronidazole |
Vancomycin |
| |
Dose |
250-500 mg |
125 mg in mild disease
500 mg in severe disease |
| |
Frequency |
TID-QID |
TID-QID |
| |
Duration |
10-14 days |
0-14 days |
| |
Route |
oral or IV |
oral, NG tube, or enema |
| |
Cost of
10-day therapy |
$20 |
$800 |
| |
Response rate |
98% |
>96% |
| |
Disadvantages |
• systemic side effects
• caution in pregnancy,
children less than
10 years of age |
• possible growth of
resistant organisms
• costly |
|
Less frequently employed therapies include bacitracin, teicoplanin,
colestipol, and fusidic acid. Bacitracin has been used to treat
CDC but has proven to be less effective. The response rate is about
80% and the relapse rate is more than 30%, which is higher than
conventional therapy.
Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide similar to vancomycin, but more potent
than vancomycin. It is as effective as vancomycin and is associated
with a lower relapse rate, but is seldom used in the United States
because it is not readily available and is costly.
Ion exchange resins such as colestipol have a response rate of
only 36% and as a result are not recommended for treatment of CDC.
Similarly, fusidic acid is seldom used because it is not as effective
as conventional therapy and is associated with a higher relapse
rate.
How is severe pseudomembranous colitis managed?
Severe pseudomembranous colitis, which occurs in 3% to 5% of patients
with CDC, is associated with a mortality of about 65% and must be
aggressively treated. In critically ill patients, vancomycin is
recommended as first-line therapy, mainly due to a quicker clinical
response in comparison with metronidazole. Patients with severe
disease and ileus may even be given a combination of antibiotics
such as vancomycin via nasogastric tube, IV metronidazole, and vancomycin-retention
enemas. The enemas are given through a number 18 Foley catheter,
with 500 mg vancomycin in 100 ml saline administered every six hours.
Other modalities include giving pooled human immunoglobulin intravenously
to increase serum IgG antitoxin levels, which are depressed in patients
with severe disease. Patients who have not responded to conventional
therapy have been successfully treated in this manner.
Occasionally, emergency surgery with colectomy is required to prevent
death in patients with severe CDC who have failed antibiotic therapy
and have established or impending bowel perforation. The surgery
of choice, subtotal colectomy with ileostomy, has a failure rate
of 24%.
What factors contribute to relapse of CDC
and how is the recurrence managed?
In as many as one in five cases, CDC may relapse on discontinuation
of therapy. When it occurs, the symptoms usually reappear between
3 and 21 days after conventional therapy is completed. The cause
of relapse is not known, but it may be related to an impaired host
immune system, low levels of immunoglobulins against C. difficile
toxins, and persistent germination of C. difficile spores
in the colon that remain despite treatment. To date, there is little
evidence that relapses are caused by resistant organisms.
The management of recurrent CDC involves retreatment with the same
antibiotic that was used to treat the initial episode. According
to one study, the response was 92% after a single repeat course
of antibiotics. If there is a second relapse, a taper-and-pulse
course of vancomycin 125 mg is given over five weeks as follows:
four times daily for one week, twice daily for one week, daily for
one week, every other day for one week, and every three days for
one week.
Other therapies that have been tried include combining the vancomycin
taper-and-pulse therapy with cholestyramine, rifampicin, or biotherapy.
Cholestyramine should be given two to three hours apart from vancomycin
to prevent it from binding with vancomycin. Biotherapy, which is
therapy with microorganisms such as Saccharomyces boulardii
to restore normal colonic flora, has been successfully tried in
combination with metronidazole or vancomycin in patients with recurrent
CDC, but it has not been as effective in initial episodes. These
combination therapies have been tried in small studies and should
be utilized when other options have been exhausted.
How can CDC be prevented?
Prevention of CDC can largely be achieved by limiting antibiotic
use, proper hand washing between contacts with all patients, using
disposable gloves and gowns when dealing with patients and objects
infected with C. difficile, enteric isolation of infected
patients, and disinfecting contaminated objects with sodium hypochlorite
or ethylene oxide. Educating hospital personnel about the disease
and its epidemiology is also important.
back to top
|
Suggested Reading
Bartlett JG: Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. N Engl J Med
346(5):334, 2002.
Bingley PJ and Harding GM: Clostridium difficile colitis
following treatment with metronidazole and vancomycin. Postgrad
Med J 63(745):993, 1987.
Burke GW, et al.: Absence of diarrhea in toxic megacolon
complicating Clostridium difficile pseudomembranous
colitis. Am J Gastroenterol 83(3):304, 1988.
Cunningham R, et al.: Proton pump inhibitors as a risk factor
for Clostridium difficile diarrhoea. J Hosp Infect
54(3):243, 2003.
Fekety R: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of
Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis.
Am J Gastroenterol 92(5):739, 1997.
George WL, et al.: Clostridium difficile and its cytotoxin
in feces of patients with antimicrobial agent-associated diarrhea
and miscellaneous conditions. J Clin Microbiol 15(6):1049,
1982.
Grundfest-Broniatowski S, et al.: Clostridium difficile
colitis in the critically ill. Dis Colon Rectum 39(6):619,
1996.
Kelly CP, et al.: Clostridium difficile colitis. N
Engl J Med 330(4):257, 1994.
Kleinfeld DI, et al.: Parenteral therapy for antibiotic-associated
pseudomembranous colitis. J Infect Dis 157(2):389, 1988.
Kofsky P, et al.: Clostridium difficilea common
and costly colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 34(3):244, 1991.
Leung DY, et al.: Treatment with intravenously administered
gamma globulin of chronic relapsing colitis induced by Clostridium
difficile toxin. J Pediatr 118(4 [Pt 1]):633, 1991.
McFarland LV, et al.: A randomized placebo-controlled trial
of Saccharomyces boulardii in combination with standard antibiotics
for Clostridium difficile disease. JAMA 271(24):1913,
1994.
Olson MM, et al.: Ten years of prospective Clostridium
difficile-associated disease surveillance and treatment
at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center, 1982-1991. Infect Control
Hosp Epidemiol 15(6):371, 1994.
Rybolt AH, et al.: Protein-losing enteropathy associated
with Clostridium difficile infection. Lancet 1(8651):1353,
1989.
Samore MH, et al.: Clinical and molecular epidemiology of
sporadic and clustered cases of nosocomial Clostridium
difficile diarrhea. Am J Med 100(1):32, 1996.
Teasley DG, et al.: Prospective randomised trial of metronidazole
versus vancomycin for Clostridium-difficile-associated
diarrhoea and colitis. Lancet 2(8358):1043, 1983.
Wilcox MH, et al.: Financial burden of hospital-acquired
Clostridium difficile infection. J Hosp Infect 34(1):23,
1996.
|
|