|

Acute Abdominal Pain in the Elderly
Why does the same abdominal pathology sometimes
cause less pain and discomfort in an older patient than in a younger
one? What age-related differences in presentation and course have
been documented in such conditions as cholecystitis and appendicitis?
Which clinical characteristics are of highest prognostic significance
in the older patient with an acute abdomen? The authors address
these and other questions.
By Michael D. Burg, MD, FACEP, and Lynda Francis,
MSN, FNP
Roughly 5% to 10% of emergency department visits in the United
States are for abdominal pain, and the elderly account for a disproportionate
share of these presentations. In a large worldwide survey of more
than 10,000 patients with acute abdominal pain, 23% were 50 years
of age or older. Two large survey studiesone performed throughout
continental Europe, the other limited to Englandfound a similar
percentage of acute abdominal pain patients aged 50 or older.
Elderly patients are overrepresented because many medical conditions
that cause or lead to painful abdominal disorders are more common
in the elderly. These include intra-abdominal malignancies, vascular
disease, cholelithiasis, and diverticulosis, among others. The elderly
are more likely to have had prior abdominal surgery, making their
evaluation potentially more challenging. In one study of acute appendicitis
presentations in which an age of 50 years was used as a cut-off,
23% of those studied who were over age 50 had had previous surgery
versus approximately 3% of those under age 50.
At least one study has found that in addition to their diagnostic
complexity and frequent presentation in the acute care setting, elderly
individuals with abdominal pain are the most time-consuming of all
emergency department patients. One likely reason for this is that
the emergency team must consider serious extra-abdominal causes of
abdominal pain, particularly acute coronary syndromes, in elderly
patients.
How is "elderly" defined in the
literature on this subject?
Approximately 13% of the United States population is age 65 or
older, which is how "elderly" is defined in this article.
Within 20 years, almost 20% of the United States population will
be age 65 or older. For research purposes, the elderly are divided
into the young-old (age 65 to 74), the middle-old (age 75 to 84),
and the old-old (age 85 or older).
Most of the studies that address abdominal pain in the elderly
have focused on patients who are age 65 or older, although this
age cutoff is arbitrary for clinical purposes. Many of these studies
include some subgroup analysis based on the three categories of
the elderly defined above.
Studies that used an age cutoff other than age 65 or older or found
important differences in the three elderly subgroups will be cited
in this review.
What factors account for the differences
in presentation between elderly patients with abdominal pain and
younger patients with the same complaint?
For a variety of reasons, the elderlyeven those with serious
intra-abdominal pathologytend to delay seeking medical care.
One study comparing patients under age 65 versus those over age
65 with culture-proven intra-abdominal infections found the older
patients had symptoms for an average of nine days before seeking
medical care versus four days with the younger patients. Additionally,
elderly patients ultimately diagnosed with common intra-abdominal
diseases and conditions (cholecystitis, for example) present atypically
and are more likely than younger patients to have atypical physical
examination and laboratory findings.
The reasons underlying delayed presentation for abdominal pain
in the elderly are not well studied or elucidated in the literature.
It has been suggested that the elderly do not sense pain as acutely
as younger individuals or that perhaps they have less discomfort
on average with a similar intra-abdominal ailment, but neither of
these suppositions has been definitively demonstrated. Many physicians
have observed that elderly patients with serious, even life-threatening
intra-abdominal pathology (such as emphysematous cholecystitis,
leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm, or perforated viscous) may present
with minimal abdominal pain. Neuropathyespecially when linked
to diabetes, a common age-associated disease„or the chronic use
of certain medications (such as corticosteroids or pain relievers)
may also blunt pain perception. The elderly may also lose abdominal
wall muscle mass, making guarding either impossible or less apparent.
Does immunosenescence play any role in elderly
patients' decreased pain perception?
Immunosenescence, a decline in immune system function with age,
may also predispose the elderly to sense less intra-abdominal discomfort
than younger patients. However, the very concept of immunosenescence,
let alone how it impacts intra-abdominal disease presentations in
the elderly, is not completely understood.
Certainly, physical changes associated with aging may result in
the perception of less pain for a given condition, but social or
cultural factors probably play a role as well. For example, many
elderly people see the hospital as a place to go to die. Others
may feel that the emergency department is appropriate only for patients
with life-threatening conditions. Still others may simply be unwilling
to visit an emergency department or other acute care setting for
abdominal discomfort, which they may see as a minor annoyance. The
desire "not to bother the doctor" or "to wait and
see how things are in a couple of days" may lead to serious
delays in presentation and ultimately in diagnosis and treatment.
Although it has not been the subject of rigorous scientific inquiry
for abdominal pain patients, elderly patients' inability to provide
an accurate history may interfere with the physician's assessment
of their condition. "Feeling weak," "not feeling
well," or "not eating" may be the only history elicited
in an elderly patient. Obviously, the differential diagnosis for
such vague complaints is extremely broad. Time spent investigating
other potential causes of the patient's complaint may mean abdominal
pathology goes undiagnosed for an extended period. Also, the high
incidence of dementia and stroke limits the ability of the elderly
to communicate with physicians and other health care providers.
Finally, the tendency of some elderly patients to minimize their
abdominal symptoms may lead the unwary physician astray. Again,
the yield or accuracy of particular styles of questioning has not
been scientifically scrutinized, but using the patientÍs own words
to help them describe their symptoms may be helpful. Rather than
asking about abdominal pain in patients who say "I'm not feeling
well," it would be better to ask them to describe what they
mean. If they offer "stomach ache," use that term rather
than "pain" to refer to their complaint. Words such as
"soreness," "ache," "nausea," and
"sick" can serve as surrogates for abdominal pain and
help accelerate a focused work-up.
Are the physical examination findings in
elderly patients with acute abdominal pain different from those
in younger patients?
Not only do the elderly tend to complain less of abdominal pain,
but their physical examination findings are less sensitive and specific
than those of younger patients. This has been shown in multiple
studies.
In one series of geriatric inpatients (mean age 82 years) with
pathologically-proven peritonitis from a variety of causes, only
73% had abdominal tenderness, 34% guarding or abdominal muscle rigidity,
69% abdominal distension, and 52% diminished or absent bowel sounds.
In this same group, tachycardia (heart rate over 100 beats/minute)
was present in roughly 90% of patients, fever (defined in this study
as a temperature over 98.6ÅF) in about 85%, and hypotension (not
defined) in approximately 60%. However, these vital sign abnormalities
are extremely nonspecific and may be present in a wide variety of
conditions. In this highly selected population, the traditional
physical examination findings of peritonitis were surprisingly infrequent.
In another study of geriatric emergency department patients, Marco
cautioned that "most physical examination findings were not
helpful in identifying patients with adverse outcomes." Of
all the physical examination findings available for analysis in
this study, only hypotension and abnormal bowel sounds were found
to be helpful in identifying patients with a higher risk of adverse
outcomes, again illustrating the nonspecific nature of physical
findings in the elderly with abdominal pain.
At least one study has examined whether the presence of fever can
be used to screen for surgery-related pathology in the elderly.
This study concluded that temperature elevation alone was inadequate
to differentiate nonsurgical from surgical abdominal pathology.
In this same study, a wide variety of commonly performed screening
laboratory tests were evaluated for their ability to identify patients
with surgical versus nonsurgical conditions. All tests failed to
reliably distinguish between the two patient groups.
Hypothermia in association with various intra-abdominal infections
may be more common in the elderly. Using a cut-off of 96.8ŰF,
one study by Cooper and colleagues found 14% of elderly patients
(over age 65) to be hypothermic versus just 3% of those 65 years
of age or younger. Interestingly, this study is one of the few to
report that physical findings (abdominal tenderness, peritoneal
signs, and lethargy) were similar between groups, although no statistics
were provided in the paper to support this contention.
Have any studies been done that looked at
specific conditions that can cause abdominal pain in the elderly?
Several condition-specific studies have been performed. In the
case of cholecystitis, an investigation by Gruber et al found that
the "absence of fever was as likely in patients younger than
60 years as it was in patients older than 60." However, the
authors note that only 32% of their study subjects with pathologically-proven
cholecystitis had a documented temperature elevation within eight
hours of their arrival in the emergency department. This should
serve as a caution for health care providers evaluating all patients
with the possible diagnosis of cholecystitis. The classic presentation
of abdominal pain, anorexia, nausea and vomiting with fever, and
an increased white blood cell (WBC) count does not occur in a significant
percentage of patientsyoung and oldwith cholecystitis.
In another study of elderly patients (age 65 or older) with cholecystitis,
56% were afebrile, demonstrating that the classic physical exam
findings reported in texts and taught in the classroom may not be
so classic in practice.
Appendicitis in the elderly has been the subject of several studies.
Horattas and colleagues estimate that "5% to 10% of all cases
of appendicitis occur in the elderly." However, the morbidity
and mortality of appendicitis are significantly increased in this
population. In their study of 96 elderly patients (over 60 years
of age) with appendicitis, Horattas and colleagues found that only
20% presented with the classic combination of anorexia, fever, right
lower quadrant pain, and an elevated WBC count. Using a cutoff of
99.7°F, only 47% had fever and 23% had either diffuse abdominal
tenderness or tenderness localized outside the right lower quadrant.
One survey of emergency physicians attempted to quantify what many
of us may feel in daily practicediscomfort with our ability
to manage and evaluate older patients with abdominal pain. A mailed
survey found that emergency physicians reported more difficulty
managing older patients with a variety of conditions, including
abdominal pain, and felt they required more time and resources to
evaluate. Given the information presented above, it seems as though
this uncomfortable feeling is justified.
Are there diseases and conditions that cause
abdominal pain in elderly patients that are different from those
seen in younger adults?
The causes of abdominal pain in the elderly are not truly different,
but their relative frequencies are.
Serious vascular disease causing abdominal pain (acute mesenteric
ischemia and abdominal aortic aneurysm, in particular) is uncommon
in all age groups but is rare in those under 50 years of age. Thereafter,
its incidence climbs.
Roughly 75% of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia are age
70 or older. For those patients with transmural bowel necrosis and
peritonitis, the mortality rate is 80% to 100% regardless of the
diagnostic and therapeutic approach taken. The overall mortality
rate for mesenteric ischemia is lower, especially in patients diagnosed
before peritonitis occurs.
Dissection or rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm occurs primarily
in the elderly. Elderly men with histories of smoking, hypertension,
or other vascular disease are at particularly high risk. Up to one
third of patients are initially misdiagnosed, often with catastrophic
results. It is important to consider an intra-abdominal vascular
event early in the evaluation of elderly patients with abdominal
pain.
Intestinal obstruction is a common problem in the elderly. Large
bowel obstructions are most commonly due to malignancies, although
multiple other etiologies are possible. Small bowel obstructions
generally result from adhesions, neoplasms, or hernias. Health care
providers should always inquire about prior surgery when evaluating
a patient with abdominal pain. In one large series, Dombal described
roughly 3% of abdominal pain patients younger than age 50 having
had prior abdominal surgery, versus 21% of patients over age 50.
Other common causes of abdominal pain in the elderly include cholecystitis,
appendicitis, pancreatitis, diverticular disease, cancer, and hernias.
The diagnosis of nonspecific abdominal pain is made in approximately
40% of patients under age 50 but in only 15% of those over 50. It
is well known that young people (especially those in their 20s and
30s) with nonspecific abdominal pain tend to have a benign course.
This has not been convincingly demonstrated in those over age 50.
Health care providers should be very wary of assigning the label
"nonspecific abdominal pain" to patients over 50.
Are elderly patients with abdominal pain
more likely than younger patients to have surgical conditions?
In general, diagnoses requiring surgery are far more common in
the elderly. The risk of a surgical diagnosis doubles with each
decade over 40.
Biliary disease, cancer, and vascular conditions occur with greater
incidence in elderly patients. These conditions often require careful
consideration for surgical correction. In patients older than 70,
biliary tract disease and intestinal obstruction are the most common
causes of abdominal pain requiring surgical intervention. In a large
study involving 2406 elderly patients (defined as over age 50),
cholecystitis was found to be the most common ailment. The frequency
was greater than 50% in patients older than 70. Small bowel obstruction
is five times more common in patients older than 50.
Additionally, intra-abdominal cancers and vascular conditions are
more common in elderly patients. The incidence of an intra-abdominal
malignancy is up to 24% in patients over age 70 with a complaint
of abdominal pain.
Mesenteric ischemia and infarction are also more common in elderly
patients. Conditions that increase the risk for this process include
cirrhosis, abdominal infection, atrial fibrillation, prosthetic
valves, and hypercoagulable states. The classic description of a
patient with mesenteric infarction is that they have pain out of
proportion to their physical findings. This textbook scenario, however,
is not always present.
Mesenteric (or abdominal) angina patients often present with an
adversity to eating and resultant weight loss due to their predictable
postprandial pain.
Further complicating the diagnostic process is the fact that many
conditions evolve differently in the elderly. Subtle differences
in the presentation of common disease processes increase the time
to diagnosis, resulting in disease progression. For example, the
presenting symptoms of appendicitis are often subtle in the elderly,
with predominant symptoms being vague periumbilical discomfort and
anorexia. The incidence of perforated appendicitis is up to 37%
in the elderly versus 4% in younger patients.
In general, when evaluating an elderly patient with abdominal pain,
health care providers should have a low threshold for obtaining
surgical consultation.
Are there high-risk factors in elderly patients
with abdominal pain that predict a poorer outcome?
Certain factors are associated with a high risk of adverse outcomes
in elderly patients with abdominal pain. A 1998 study by Marco et
al reviewed the course of 380 elderly patients (age 65 or older)
in an effort to identify variables strongly associated with a poor
outcome, defined as death or need for surgery. Four factors were
found to be associated with death: free air on abdominal radiographs,
age over 84 years, other significant x-ray findings (such as kidney
or gall stones or abdominal aortic aneurysm), and bandemia. Hypotension,
abnormal bowel sounds, abnormal x-ray findings, and leukocytosis
were all associated with a need for surgery.
The study authors cautioned that "the absence of these variables
does not preclude significant disease." They also stated that
physical examination is an unreliable method for predicting or excluding
significant disease.
Another important variable to consider when evaluating elderly
patients with abdominal pain is the high incidence of comorbid conditions.
About 88% of older patients have comorbid conditions, compared to
48% of younger patients. More than half of the time, these comorbidities
include cardiac diseases. Coexisting medical conditions may be more
important than age as negative prognostic indicators. Coagulopathy,
renal failure, coronary artery disease, and chronic pulmonary disease
increase the likelihood of a negative outcome. Elderly patients
with these conditions are less able to tolerate the physiologic
stress imposed by an acute illness or surgery.
What is the mortality associated with acute
abdominal pain in the elderly?
It is axiomatic that mortality rates rise steeply with age. For
example, patients over 80 years of age presenting with abdominal
pain have a mortality rate 70 times that of young adults.
Many factors contribute to mortality in this population, including
physiologic frailty, low initial diagnostic accuracy (generally
only 40% to 65%, dropping to less than 30% in patients over age
80), diagnostic delays, atypical and late presentations, and comorbid
conditions.
One study of 334 patients older than 70 who underwent elective
gastrointestinal surgery found a 6.7% mortality rate. However, the
death rate tripled (to 20%) when elective surgical procedures were
delayed and emergency gastrointestinal operations were required.
In short, delayed elective surgery in the elderly patient leads
to higher mortality rates.
The mortality rates for many intra-abdominal conditions in the
elderly rivals that of serious cardiopulmonary diseases. Elderly
patients with abdominal pain need to be evaluated just as carefullyand
admitted just as liberallyas those with chest pain.
back to top
|
Suggested Reading
Bender JS: Approach to the acute abdomen. Med Clin N Am 73(6):1413,
1989.
Bugliosi TF, et al.: Acute abdominal pain in the elderly.
Ann Emerg Med 19:1383, 1990.
Collucciello SA, et al.: Assessing abdominal pain in adults:
a rational, cost-effective, and evidence-based strategy. Emergency
Medicine Practice 1(1):1, 1999.
Cooper GS, et al.: Intraabdominal infection: differences
in presentation and outcome between younger patients and the
elderly. Clin Infect Dis 19:146, 1994.
de Dombal FT: Acute abdominal pain in the elderly. J Clin
Gastroenterol 19(4):331, 1994.
Esses D, et al.: Ability of CT to alter decision making
in elderly patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg
Med 22:270, 2004.
Gruber PJ, et al.: Presence of fever and leukocytosis in
acute cholecystitis. Ann Emerg Med 28:273, 1996.
Hendrickson M and Naparst TR: Abdominal surgical emergencies
in the elderly. Emerg Med Clin N Am 21:937, 2003.
Horattas MC, et al.: A reappraisal of appendicitis in the
elderly. Am J Surg 160:291, 1990.
Itskowitz MS and Jones SM: GI Consult: Appendicitis. Emerg
Med 36(10):10, 2004.
Kamin RA, et al.: Pearls and pitfalls in the emergency department
evaluation of abdominal pain. Emerg Med Clin N Am 21:61, 2003.
Marco CA, et al.: Abdominal pain in geriatric patients:
variables associated with adverse outcomes. Acad Emerg Med
5:1163, 1998.
McNamara RM, et al: Geriatric emergency medicine: a survey
of practicing emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med 21:796,
1992.
Miettinen P, et al.: The outcome of elderly patients after
operation for acute abdomen. Ann Chir Gynaecol 85:11, 1996.
Miettinen P, et al.: Acute abdominal pain in adults. Ann
Chir Gynaecol 85:5, 1996.
Parker JS, et al.: Abdominal pain in the elderly: use of
temperature and laboratory testing to screen for surgical
disease. Fam Med 28:193, 1996.
Parker LJ, et al.: Emergency department evaluation of geriatric
patients with acute cholecystitis. Acad Emerg Med 4:51, 1997.
Reiss R and Deutsch AA: Emergency abdominal procedures in
patients above 70. J Gerontol 40(2):154, 1985.
Sanson TG and OÍKeefe KP: Evaluation of abdominal pain in
the elderly. Emerg Med Clin N Am 14(3):615, 1996.
Singer AJ, et al.: Correlation among clinical, laboratory,
and hepatobiliary scanning findings in patients with suspected
acute cholecystitis. Ann Emerg Med 28:267, 1996.
Storm-Dickerson TL and Horattas MC: What have we learned
over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly?
Am J Surg 185:198, 2003.
Telfer S, et al.: Acute abdominal pain in patients over 50
years of age. Scand J Gastroenterol 23(suppl 144):47, 1988.
Walker JS and Dire DJ: Vascular abdominal emergencies. Emerg
Med Clin N Am 14(3):571, 1996.
Wroblewski M and Mikulowski P: Peritonitis in geriatric
inpatients. Age Ageing 20:90, 1991.
|
|