|

Overdoses Involving Cardiovascular Drugs
By Lewis Nelson, MD
A 56-year-old man was brought to the emergency department two hours
after he ingested an unknown quantity of verapamil during a suicide
attempt. On arrival, his heart rate was 50, blood pressure 90/60
mm Hg, and his mental status was good. An electrocardiogram revealed
junctional bradycardia.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
In the absence of evidence pointing to an overdose of verapamil,
the most likely cause of this patient's symptoms would be myocardial
infarction. Unless the history clearly implicates such an ingestion,
the possibility of myocardial ischemia must be investigated and
ruled out. That done, the differential diagnosis would shift to
the myriad possible cardiotoxins.
The differential diagnosis of drug-induced bradycardia and hypotension
is broad and complicated by the fact that the clinical findings
described may be triggered by agents that are not directly cardiotoxic.
For example, clonidine causes bradycardia through a reduction in
centrally mediated sympathetic stimulation. Similarly, the alpha1-adrenergic
agonist phenylpropanolamine produces a reflex response that occurs
after a rapid increase in blood pressure.
Cholinesterase inhibitors such as organophosphorous compounds
and carbamates can cause bradycardia, because inhibition of acetylcholine
metabolism enhances vagal tone in the conduction system. Despite
the inability of acetylcholine to be cleared from the vagus nerve
of patients who have organophosphate poisoning, however, many such
patients present with tachycardia, perhaps because sympathetic tone
is enhanced by either bronchorrhea-induced hypoxemia or the action
of acetylcholine on nicotinic receptors in the autonomic ganglia.
Digoxin and other cardiac steroids also slow conduction through
the heart by enhancing vagal tone. Both the positive inotropic effects
of digoxin and its potentially life-threatening toxicity are mediated
by its direct effects on the myocardium--namely, inhibition of the
normal exchange of sodium and potassium during repolarization, resulting
in an increase in intracellular calcium. Although small increases
in intracellular calcium enhance myocardial contractility, large
elevations affect the electrical stability of the heart by increasing
its resting potential.
Many agents cause bradycardia through sodium-channel blockade
with subsequent slowing of myocardial depolarization and prolongation
of the action potential. Aside from type I and III antiarrhythmic
drugs, important examples include tricyclic antidepressants, thioridazine,
and cocaine. It is worth noting, however, that in mildly poisoned
patients the anticholinergic effects of the tricyclic agents and
of quinidine and the sympathomimetic effects of cocaine more commonly
produce tachycardia. In severe poisoning, the degree of sodium-channel
blockade surpasses the capacity of the cells to depolarize and repolarize,
and bradycardia ensues.
Beta-adrenergic antagonists can cause bradycardia not only during
an overdose but also at therapeutic dosages. The effects of beta-blockade
may not be overwhelming in previously healthy patients who do not
require significant sympathetic stimulation at rest. The risk of
a severe response is high, however, in patients with congestive
heart failure, who may require significant sympathetic nervous system
stimulation to maintain cardiac contractility and heart rate even
at rest. However, because several of the beta-blockers, such as
pindolol, actually produce intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, someone
who has overdosed on one of these agents may present with a normal
or elevated heart rate.
Calcium-channel blocker overdose may cause profound bradycardia,
often accompanied by various degrees of atrioventricular heart block.
For the sake of simplicity, patients who have taken overdose amounts
of calcium-channel blocker and beta-blocker agents are often classified
together, but the subtle differences in presentation and management
should be noted. For example, whereas patients with calcium-channel
blocker poisoning more often remain conscious--even with profound
alterations in vital signs--the opposite is true of patients who
have taken an overdose of beta-blockers. Whether this difference
occurs because calcium-channel blockers promote neuronal stability
by inhibiting the influx of calcium or because most beta-blockers
are highly lipophilic is not known.
Electrocardiographic abnormalities also tend to differ between
the two groups. Ventricular conduction disturbances are more likely
to occur in patients who have beta-blocker poisoning, because the
drugs are able to block myocardial sodium channels, whereas high-degree
atrioventricular blocks are more likely to occur in patients who
have calcium-channel blocker poisoning. In addition, seizures are
more common after beta-blocker overdose than after calcium-channel
blocker poisoning. Finally, although hyperglycemia can occur with
either type of overdose, only beta-blockers cause hypoglycemia.
TREATMENT
The advanced cardiac life support algorithm for treating bradydysrhythmia
is a useful starting point for the empiric management of poisoned
patients who have bradycardia. Atropine is virtually always safe
when given in an appropriate doseas much as 3 mg for an adultbut
its efficacy may be limited in patients who do not have bradycardia
caused by organophosphate or cardiac-glycoside exposure. The major
disadvantage is smooth muscle atony, which could impair attempts
to achieve adequate gastrointestinal decontamination.
If digoxin poisoning is confirmed or strongly suspected, antidotal
therapy with digoxin immune Fab must be administered as soon as
symptomatic or progressive bradycardia appears. If a sodium-channel
blocker is involved, an intravenous bolus of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate,
1 to 2 mEq/kg, or hypertonic saline must be administered initially
in an attempt to overwhelm the sodium-channel blockade.
The first step in managing patients poisoned by either a calcium-channel
blocker or beta-adrenergic antagonist is to aggressively support
the vital signs. External pacemakers should be employed early, but
capture or acceleration may be difficult. Fluid therapylimited
only by the presence of congestive heart failureshould precede
administration of vasopressor or inotropic agents. For patients
undergoing calcium channel blockade, calcium is clearly the therapeutic
agent of choice, and its nonspecific cardiac effects may also be
beneficial for patients with beta-blocker poisoning. The recommended
dose is approximately 1 gm of calcium chloride or 3 gm of calcium
gluconate, each of which contains approximately 13 mEq.
Invasive monitoring is ideal but not always practical. In its
stead, pressor or inotropic agents are largely empiric, with the
dose titrated to the response. Because paradoxical reactions to
these medications often occur, vital signs must be closely monitored
after any medication or dosage change. Some patients, for example,
may have a decrease in blood pressure after administration of norepinephrine,
a result that occurs because the impaired myocardium cannot overcome
the increase in systemic vascular resistance caused by the alpha-adrenergic
effects of the drug.
Hypotension and bradycardia caused by beta-blocker poisoning may
respond more predictably to glucagon than to catecholamine therapy.
The inotropic effects of glucagon are qualitatively similar to those
of catecholamine agents but are not mediated by the beta-receptors.
As a result, glucagon can work in patients undergoing beta-blockade
therapy, but catecholamines cannot gain access to the receptors.
Recently, intravenous insulin in doses of 0.1 U/kg with sufficient
glucose to maintain euglycemia has been found to produce excellent
results in experimental models and actual patients who have ingested
an overdose of beta-blockers. Although the mechanism is undefined,
the benefit is probably related to improved energy handling by the
myocytes, and the result is enhanced inotropism.
When necessary, heroic measures may entail the use of an intraaortic
balloon pump or extracorporeal circulation; hemodialysis, however,
has no known role.
One of the most important, and often neglected, aspects of treatment
is aggressive gastrointestinal decontamination. Stabilization of
vital signs is undoubtedly paramount, but removing the toxic source
will presumably limit the duration and extent of the problem. The
choice of which decontamination procedure to use depends on several
factors. If an ingested toxin is not likely to cause death, activated
charcoal usually will suffice. On the other hand, a more aggressive
approach is indicated for patients who have taken an overdose of
a high-risk medication, such as verapamil, or who have life-threatening
vital sign abnormalities.
Sustained-release preparations can be given once or twice a day,
a dosage that helps enhance compliance with therapy, and the improved
pharmacokinetic profiles of these formulations indicate fewer peaks
and troughs. The disadvantage associated with these preparations,
however, is the severe and prolonged toxic effects that often occur
when the retarded release of a drug is combined with the large gastrointestinal
burden that occurs after an overdose. Fortunately, the stability
of the pills makes whole bowel irrigation possible. The procedure
entails administering a large volume (2 to 3 L/hr for an adult)
of a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution orally or via nasogastric
tube. No significant systemic absorption occurs, and the entire
gastrointestinal tract is cleared in three to six hours.
PATIENT OUTCOME
Because the patient in this case ingested a sustained-release
formulation of verapamil, he underwent whole bowel irrigation with
a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution and received early supportive
care, antidotal therapy with a total of 8 gm of intravenous calcium
chloride, and norepinephrine. Although beneficial, those measures
failed to increase his heart rate and blood pressure sufficiently.
Early application of a balloon pump, however, significantly improved
systemic perfusion. The patient's cardiac rhythm improved progressively
and he recovered fully by the third hospital day.
Dr. Nelson is director of the medical toxicology
fellowship and associate director of the New York City Poison Control
Center. He is also an assistant professor in the department of surgery/emergency
medicine at New York University School of Medicine.
Emerg Med 33(2):68, 2001
|